Meeting log for 2008-09-17

Well, this one was a pain to summarise, thanks to lots of good,
relevant questions about the treasure. I hope I haven't misreported
anyone's meaning, but the full log is at the bottom if you want it.

I'm optimistic about the treasurer's reports and the two resolutions
passed, but I'm really disappointed by the apparent adoption of "aob".
That is a further departure from the proper order of business (roll
call, minutes, reports, old business, new business, welfare,
adjournment). In the words of "Making Meetings Happen" by Robert
Burns: AOB "is a minefield ticking away beneath the surface of the
agenda, ready to explode when everyone is tired and ready to go. [...]
If something is worth discussing, it should specifically appear on the
agenda."

HIGHLIGHTS

<Ganneff> Today's agenda and details of pending resolutions can be
found on the web at:
http://www.spi-inc.org/secretary/agenda/2008/2008-09-17.html

[item 2, Roll Call]
<zobel> Martin Zobel-Helas <luk__> Luk Claes
<linuxpoet> Joshua D. Drake <Maulkin> Neil Mcgovernm
<schultmc> Michael Schultheiss <Hydroxide> David Graham has sent regrets
<Ganneff> Joerg Jaspert <Hydroxide> Jimmy Kaplowitz

[item 3, President's Report]
<Ganneff> None.

[item 4, Treasurer's Report]
<schultmc> http://www.spi-inc.org/treasurer/2008-09-17-draft-report.html/view
is a draft report. I'm currently working with Josh Berkus to get the
outstanding credit card donations imported. Josh is also documenting
his process so I can run reports ad hoc.

<schultmc> [It will be non-draft] as soon as the credit card info has
been input I anticipate that data to be available in the next few
days. [It covers the] start of the data entry system until today -
expenses are current as of today, donations via check as end of
august. all data is on treasurer.spi-inc.org. the net column is an
approximation of balances. it's approximate since the credit card
donations haven't been imported yet

<schultmc> [the real amount of money projects have with us will be
available] as soon as the credit card data has been input I'll
generate a proper report. [on -private within two weeks] should be
doable

[item 5, Secretary's report]
<Hydroxide> Neil is still working on the minutes for the meetings
during which he was secretary, up to and including the August meeting.
I'll be responsible for minutes starting this meeting.

[item 6, Outstanding minutes]
<Maulkin> None from me I'm afraid, I hope to get these for next meeting.

[item 7, Stuff for discussion]

* schultmc initially proposed Tux4Kids join SPI when Sam Hart was
still involved [but] that process stalled since T4K needed different
things at the time

<kendrick> so a little history. Tux4Kids is participating in Google
Summer of Code this year. Towards the end, we discovered that payments
to mentor orgs are made as a lump sum to each org. anyway, since i was
admin of Tux4Kid's participation in GSOC, i figured i'd end up taking
the lump sum, which i plan to disperse to the other mentors. that
would cause a big tax hit for me. so in looking for solutions, i
noticed some of the other mentor orgs participating in GSOC were part
of SPI (hi, josh) so decided to look into joining tux4kids is not
currently a non-profit. a friend org, OSEF, is also not currently a
non-profit, i think. and SPI looks like a very good fit. we're busy
trying to develop edu software (and manage projects, maintain
websites, do PR, etc. etc.) so having one more thing to do (taxes,
finances, etc.) would be a big burden I personally have a long history
in Tux4Kids and linux orgs. i co-founded the LUG in my town, and now
(nearly 10 years later) continue to run it. I've been working, mostly
non-stop, on Tux Paint since mid-2002

<Hydroxide> voting results for "Tux4Kids as associated project": Yes:
7, No: 0, Abstain: 0, Missing: 0 ()

<Hydroxide> making a statement in support of this event was proposed
via email by slef on -general a couple of weeks ago, and he proposed
the text in the agenda one week ago. it speaks for itself and doesn't
really need slef here to explain it, which is why it's still on the
agenda in his absence.

<linuxpoet> I think there is a question as to whether we want to be an
activist organization

<luk__> well I think we can make an exception for software patents, no?

<schultmc>
http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/resolutions/1998-11-16.iwj.2 is
already a statement on software patents (and other IP)

<Hydroxide> voting results for "Statement on World Day Against
Software Patents": Yes: 5, No: 0, Abstain: 2, Missing: 0 ()

[item 8, Next board meeting] Wednesday, 15th October 2008 - 19:00 UTC

<Ganneff> right. aob (could we put it in agenda please?) for future.

<Hydroxide> Ganneff: sure, will do.

<linuxpoet> 1. PostgreSQL is having their West conference Oct 10-12th
in Portland :) Anyone West of Denver please join us
http://www.pgcon.us/

<linuxpoet> 2. I know we have a new deadline for finance finalization
but I would like it noted for the record that the PostgreSQL Project
is getting increasingly agitated at the continual delays.

TIMED LOG

20:00:08 <Ganneff> *BANG*
20:00:09 <Ganneff> [item 1, Opening] Welcome to today's Software in the Public Interest board of directors meeting, which is now called to order. Today's agenda and details of pending resolutions can be found on the web at: http://www.spi-inc.org/secretary/agenda/2008/2008-09-17.html
20:00:11 <luk__> Luk Claes
20:00:15 <Ganneff> [item 2, Roll Call]
20:00:15 <Ganneff> Board members, please state your name for the record. As we have nine board members, quorum for today's meeting is six. Guests, please /msg your names to Hydroxide if you wish your attendance to be recorded in the minutes of this meeting.
20:00:15 <Ganneff> Hydroxide: please update us on known and tentative regrets.
20:00:16 <zobel> Martin Zobel-Helas
20:00:20 <luk__> Luk Claes
20:00:21 <linuxpoet> Joshua D. Drake
20:00:21 <Maulkin> Neil Mcgovernm
20:00:22 <Ganneff> luk__: too early.
20:00:23 <schultmc> Michael Schultheiss
20:00:25 <Hydroxide> Ganneff: agenda is correct - David Graham has sent regrets
20:00:26 <Ganneff> Joerg Jaspert
20:00:30 <Hydroxide> Jimmy Kaplowitz
20:00:48 <Hydroxide> Ganneff: MJ Ray also can't be here, which is only worth noting since one of the agenda items was drafted by him.
20:00:55 - Sledge!steve(at)lump(dot)einval(dot)com has joined #spi
20:01:13 <Ganneff> we seem to have quota, lets go on.
20:01:19 <luk__> I was only too early because it kept ringing :-)
20:01:27 <Ganneff> [item 3, President's Report]
20:01:28 <Ganneff> None.
20:01:28 <Ganneff> [item 4, Treasurer's Report]
20:01:28 <Ganneff> schultmc: have fun
20:01:36 <schultmc> http://www.spi-inc.org/treasurer/2008-09-17-draft-report.html/view is a draft report
20:01:51 <linuxpoet> allow a moment for viewing please
20:01:58 <schultmc> I'm currently working with Josh Berkus to get the outstanding credit card donations imported
20:02:00 <Ganneff> schultmc: when is it scheduled to be non-draft?
20:02:11 <schultmc> Josh is also documenting his process so I can run reports ad hoc
20:02:19 <schultmc> Ganneff: as soon as the credit card info has been input
20:02:27 <Hydroxide> schultmc: what time period does this report cover?
20:02:29 <schultmc> I anticipate that data to be available in the next few days
20:02:47 <Hydroxide> schultmc: (it's an income/expense statement, not a balance statement)
20:03:09 <schultmc> Hydroxide: start of the data entry system until today - expenses are current as of today, donations via check as end of august
20:03:33 <linuxpoet> Question in regards to financials
20:03:39 <schultmc> linuxpoet: go ahead
20:03:41 <Hydroxide> schultmc: hrm. not a very useful time period, unless it happens to have started on January 1, 2008 or similar.
20:03:46 <linuxpoet> are we in control of the data yet? (as in not being hosted by personal servers)
20:03:51 <schultmc> yes
20:04:00 <schultmc> all data is on treasurer.spi-inc.org
20:04:15 <linuxpoet> O.k. I have questions about that but I can ask after meeting
20:04:20 <schultmc> ok
20:04:31 <Ganneff> more on this topic?
20:04:36 <linuxpoet> I have one more item
20:04:39 <Ganneff> go
20:04:56 <linuxpoet> I am trying to understand this income/expense statement. Am I correct in that it doesn't actually have balances
20:05:03 <linuxpoet> because it doesn't reflect my knowledge of PostgreSQL's finances
20:05:13 <schultmc> the net column is an approximation of balances
20:05:16 <Hydroxide> linuxpoet: it's not a balance sheet, as I said
20:05:29 <schultmc> it's approximate since the credit card donations haven't been imported yet
20:05:31 <Hydroxide> schultmc: but it only takes into account transactions since the start of the data entry system, right?
20:05:44 <Hydroxide> schultmc: it hasn't been added to pre-existing balances ('retained earnings' or similar)
20:05:46 <schultmc> Hydroxide: yes
20:05:50 <Hydroxide> (though that's a non-profit term)
20:05:59 <Hydroxide> *not a non-profit term
20:06:15 <luk__> normally one begins with a starting balance, so the approximation might not be very good?
20:06:51 <Hydroxide> schultmc: I appreciate all the re-working of the treasurer infrastructure since I yielded the post, but we do seem to have lost some of the regularity and completeness of the reports since then.
20:06:56 <Ganneff> so this is not the real amount of money projects have with us?! when/where/do we get a report with that info?
20:07:34 <schultmc> as soon as the credit card data has been input I'll generate a proper report
20:07:43 <Hydroxide> schultmc: whether you considered the numbers in my treasurer's reports accurate or not, please try to get some approximation of that set of information. (optionally minus some of the detail at the sub-project level)
20:07:56 <Ganneff> schultmc: on -private within two weeks a good timeframe?
20:08:06 <schultmc> Ganneff: yes, that should be doable
20:08:12 <schultmc> Hydroxide: that's my goal
20:08:23 <Ganneff> everyone ok with it? more question for this topic? more to say (schultmc?)
20:08:31 <Hydroxide> schultmc: I'll also send status request in a week to see if you're still making progress, ok? (it's taken a while)
20:08:41 <schultmc> Hydroxide: sure
20:08:45 <Hydroxide> cool
20:09:07 <Ganneff> nothing more?
20:09:19 <Ganneff> [item 5, Secretary's report]
20:09:19 <Ganneff> Hydroxide: your time
20:09:31 <Ganneff> i guess none as in agenda?
20:09:41 <Hydroxide> well
20:09:46 <Hydroxide> I'll just mention one thing
20:10:05 <Hydroxide> Neil is still working on the minutes for the meetings during which he was secretary, up to and including the August meeting
20:10:13 <Hydroxide> I'll be responsible for minutes starting this meeting
20:10:20 <Ganneff> fine.
20:10:27 <Hydroxide> that's about it in that regard.
20:10:34 <Ganneff> [item 6, Outstanding minutes]
20:10:34 <Ganneff> Again for Hydroxide. Or well, Maulkin.
20:10:58 <Hydroxide> who isn't here. as of some time in the last 24 hours, he said they were coming along "slowly", but didn't report any ready yet
20:11:13 <Maulkin> None from me I'm afraid, I hope to get these for next meeting
20:11:18 <Hydroxide> oh, hi there
20:11:21 <Maulkin> I am here! :)
20:11:23 <Ganneff> so the agenda is wrong?
20:11:36 <Hydroxide> <Maulkin> Neil McGovern
20:11:48 <Hydroxide> Ganneff: what's wrong? it says they're outstanding, not that they're ready for approval
20:11:57 <Ganneff> well, lets go on.
20:11:58 <Hydroxide> Ganneff: none of them are links and none have text
20:12:03 * Hydroxide nods
20:12:05 <Ganneff> [item 7, Stuff for discussion]
20:12:05 <Ganneff> We seem to have 2 items here, "Resolution 2008-09-17.mcs.1: Tux4Kids from Michael" and then "Statement supporting the World Day Against Software Patents from MJ Ray".
20:12:20 * kendrick perks up
20:12:29 * Hydroxide suggests that schultmc or kendrick talk about the first one
20:12:54 <kendrick> sure
20:13:06 <Ganneff> go
20:13:12 * schultmc initially proposed Tux4Kids join SPI when Sam Hart was still involved
20:13:17 <kendrick> so a little history. Tux4Kids is participating in Google Summer of Code this year
20:13:27 <schultmc> that process stalled since T4K needed different things at the time
20:13:27 <kendrick> towards the end, we discovered that payments to mentor orgs are made as a lump sum to each org
20:13:56 <kendrick> schultmc: i'm sure tux4kids still needs a lot of the same things as it did back then, but that's another issue. :)
20:14:27 <kendrick> anyway, since i was admin of Tux4Kid's participation in GSOC, i figured i'd end up taking the lump sum, which i plan to disperse to the other mentors. that would cause a big tax hit for me.
20:15:03 <kendrick> so in looking for solutions, i noticed some of the other mentor orgs participating in GSOC were part of SPI (hi, josh) so decided to look into joining
20:15:33 <kendrick> tux4kids is not currently a non-profit. a friend org, OSEF, is also not currently a non-profit, i think. and SPI looks like a very good fit.
20:16:16 <kendrick> we're busy trying to develop edu software (and manage projects, maintain websites, do PR, etc. etc.) so having one more thing to do (taxes, finances, etc.) would be a big burden
20:16:25 * Hydroxide makes minor clarifications to the Tux4Kids line item in the agenda
20:16:36 <kendrick> should we refresh that page, Hydroxide?
20:16:45 <Hydroxide> not important, no
20:17:01 <Hydroxide> anyway, sounds like your needs are indeed a good fit for SPI
20:17:28 <kendrick> i personally have a long history in Tux4Kids and linux orgs. i co-founded the LUG in my town, and now (nearly 10 years later) continue to run it.
20:17:35 <kendrick> i've been working, mostly non-stop, on Tux Paint since mid-2002
20:18:05 <Ganneff> now. sounds all good and fine, and it seems we dont hate tux4kids, so how about we go on and vote about it?
20:18:26 <kendrick> and i'm also a glutton for more work, so i've offered to be the 'decision maker' for T4K, with David Bruce (head of one of the other T4K projects) as an assist.
20:18:26 * Hydroxide seconds
20:18:36 <kendrick> and noone seemed to care, and hey. looks like you're voting
20:18:44 <Hydroxide> kendrick: I think we're ready to vote. yes. it has been discussed via email, after all. :)
20:18:51 <kendrick> (strike that -- people ENCOURAGED me be the desicionmaker :) )
20:19:07 <kendrick> Hydroxide: good point. :) i'll shut up now.
20:19:07 <Hydroxide> Voting started, 7 people (ganneff,schultmc,hydroxide,luk__,linuxpoet,zobel,maulkin) allowed to vote on Tux4Kids as associated project. - You may vote yes/no/abstain only, type !vote $yourchoice now.
20:19:11 <schultmc> !vote yes
20:19:14 <Ganneff> !vote yes
20:19:17 <Hydroxide> !vote yes
20:19:17 <linuxpoet> !vote yes
20:19:18 <zobel> !vote yes
20:19:22 <Maulkin> !vote yes
20:19:42 <Hydroxide> luk__: ?
20:19:54 <Hydroxide> going once...
20:19:57 <luk__> !vote yes
20:20:00 <Hydroxide> Current voting results for "Tux4Kids as associated project": Yes: 7, No: 0, Abstain: 0, Missing: 0 ()
20:20:04 <Hydroxide> Voting for "Tux4Kids as associated project" closed.
20:20:04 <Hydroxide> it passes.
20:20:08 <linuxpoet> Welcome aboard
20:20:11 <kendrick> (won't someone think of the children?)
20:20:16 <Maulkin> Welcome schultmc :)
20:20:17 <zobel> kendrick: welcome
20:20:19 <Ganneff> welcome tux4kids, if you accept it
20:20:21 <Maulkin> err... =ken
20:20:23 <Maulkin> bah
20:20:24 <kendrick> :)
20:20:27 <Hydroxide> kendrick: for the record, do you accept the invitation to join as per the framework linked from the resolution text?
20:20:31 <schultmc> Maulkin: thanks? :)
20:20:42 <Ganneff> now, the other point, Statement supporting the World Day Against Software Patents
20:20:45 <kendrick> http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/resolutions/2004-08-10-iwj.1 ?
20:20:47 <Ganneff> who wants to speak?
20:20:50 <Hydroxide> Ganneff: one sec
20:20:51 <linuxpoet> Ganneff: hold
20:20:57 <kendrick> yes, i accept
20:21:09 <Hydroxide> kendrick: cool. that was primarily for the record so that the invitation didn't lapse, etc
20:21:09 <Ganneff> there. now, who wants to speak? :)
20:21:23 <Hydroxide> Ganneff: I'll just say one or two things since slef isn't here
20:21:24 <linuxpoet> let me do a quick review again
20:21:30 <Ganneff> Hydroxide: go
20:22:01 <Hydroxide> making a statement in support of this event was proposed via email by slef on -general a couple of weeks ago, and he proposed the text in the agenda one week ago
20:22:11 <linuxpoet> Ok I read it
20:22:20 <Hydroxide> it speaks for itself and doesn't really need slef here to explain it, which is why it's still on the agenda in his absence
20:22:38 <Hydroxide> any comments, wishes to vote, etc?
20:22:55 <linuxpoet> Yes
20:23:06 <Ganneff> well. i say we should vote.
20:23:08 <linuxpoet> I think there is a question as to whether we want to be an activist organization
20:23:47 <Hydroxide> linuxpoet: that's definitely a relevant question. do any other board members or non-board attendees have thoughts on that?
20:24:12 <Hydroxide> linuxpoet: we already do have a stated position opposed to software patents as per the resolution which MJ references in his second preamble paragraph
20:24:12 <Ganneff> difference to proposed text?
20:24:37 <linuxpoet> Right but my question isn't really relevant to software patents (which I concur are bad)
20:24:58 <linuxpoet> Its about aligning ourselves in a political manner and thus representing ourselves as an activist organization versus an educational one
20:25:04 <linuxpoet> *shrug*
20:25:26 <luk__> linuxpoet: well I think we can make an exception for software patents, no?
20:25:28 <Hydroxide> anyone else have thoughts or motions? I'd like to hear from at least one or two other board members
20:25:33 <Hydroxide> (such as luk__ )
20:25:52 <schultmc> http://www.spi-inc.org/corporate/resolutions/1998-11-16.iwj.2 is already a statement on software patents (and other IP)
20:25:59 <Ganneff> i think its ok to support this anti-patent stuff (and already proposed to vote on this, thats unchanged) :)
20:26:07 <Hydroxide> personally, I have no problem with us taking stances on issues directly related to free software
20:26:24 <Hydroxide> especially when it isn't related to specific legislation or politicians
20:26:51 * Hydroxide points out that anyone can cause a vote on the statement by seconding it
20:26:56 <Hydroxide> (seconding Ganneff's call to vote)
20:26:59 * Maulkin seconds
20:27:01 <Hydroxide> ok
20:27:23 <Hydroxide> Voting started, 7 people (ganneff,schultmc,hydroxide,luk__,linuxpoet,zobel,maulkin) allowed to vote on Statement on World Day Against Software Patents. - You may vote yes/no/abstain only, type !vote $yourchoice now.
20:27:25 <Maulkin> !vote abstain
20:27:30 <linuxpoet> !vote abstain
20:27:35 <Ganneff> !vote yes
20:27:38 <Hydroxide> !vote yes
20:27:41 <luk__> !vote yes
20:27:47 <schultmc> !vote yes
20:27:54 <zobel> !vote yes
20:27:59 <Hydroxide> Current voting results for "Statement on World Day Against Software Patents": Yes: 5, No: 0, Abstain: 2, Missing: 0 ()
20:28:02 <Hydroxide> Voting for "Statement on World Day Against Software Patents" closed.
20:28:08 <Hydroxide> it passes.
20:28:21 <Ganneff> fine. lets go on.
20:28:23 <Ganneff> [item 8, Next board meeting]
20:28:23 <Ganneff> Going with third Wed of months it should be on Wednesday, 14th October 2008 - 19:00 UTC i think
20:28:26 <luk__> Hydroxide: I guess you take care of the press announcement?
20:28:30 <Hydroxide> who wants to work with me to draft the news release and notice to members?
20:28:33 <Hydroxide> Ganneff: one sec
20:28:39 <Ganneff> Hydroxide: sure.
20:28:49 <Hydroxide> luk__: I'll be responsible for making sure it happens, yes
20:28:59 <Hydroxide> I guess we can talk about this another time. just contact me if you're available to help.
20:29:04 <luk__> Ganneff: it's Wed *15*th
20:29:13 <Ganneff> ok. right
20:29:20 <Ganneff> Going with third Wed of months it should be on Wednesday, 15th October 2008 - 19:00 UTC i think
20:29:27 <Hydroxide> yes. and Daylight Saving / Summer Time will not have changed at all in US/EU
20:29:30 <Ganneff> anyone against this?
20:29:32 <Hydroxide> *US/EU/CA
20:29:35 <linuxpoet> Works for me at this time
20:29:36 * Maulkin sends tentative regrets
20:29:37 <Hydroxide> works for me
20:29:50 <schultmc> works for me
20:29:52 <Maulkin> I have a council meeting at 6 UK time, and if it's on, it's unlikely I'll make it
20:29:54 <Hydroxide> Maulkin: please email me too
20:29:58 <Ganneff> thanks everyone for attending, now:
20:29:59 <Maulkin> ack.
20:29:59 <Hydroxide> Maulkin: to state that
20:30:01 <Hydroxide> k
20:30:01 <Ganneff> *GAVEL*
20:30:03 <linuxpoet> Ganneff: hold
20:30:09 * Maulkin thanks ganneff
20:30:12 <linuxpoet> Ganneff: you forgot the final remarks segment
20:30:27 <Ganneff> right. aob (could we put it in agenda please?)
20:30:30 <Ganneff> for future.
20:30:34 <Hydroxide> Ganneff: sure, will do.
20:30:43 <Ganneff> linuxpoet: go, secretary: please include it in a log later.
20:30:48 <linuxpoet> O.k. I have two things
20:31:00 <Hydroxide> Ganneff: I'm still logging.
20:31:11 <linuxpoet> 1. PostgreSQL is having their West conference Oct 10-12th in Portland :) Anyone West of Denver please join us http://www.pgcon.us/
20:31:46 <linuxpoet> 2. I know we have a new deadline for finance finalization but I would like it noted for the record that the PostgreSQL Project is getting increasingly agitated at the continual delays.
20:31:51 <linuxpoet> That is all.
20:32:05 <Ganneff> anyone else something to add?
20:32:17 <Hydroxide> linuxpoet: noted for the record.
20:32:23 <linuxpoet> ty
20:32:24 <luk__> nope
20:32:30 <Ganneff> *GAVEL* (now really)

Hope that helps,
--
MJ Ray (slef)
Webmaster for hire, statistician and online shop builder for a small
worker cooperative http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ http://mjr.towers.org.uk/
(Notice http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html) tel:+44-844-4437-237