Re: Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1: OpenWRT as associated project

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org>
Cc: board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, secretary(at)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1: OpenWRT as associated project
Date: 2009-03-16 21:33:35
Message-ID: 49BEC5AF.3080806@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Jimmy,

1) What was the resolution of potential legal liabilities for OpenWRT?
Not that this means we should reject them, just that we should be informed.

> 4. Currently, Andy Boyett and Gregers Petersen are recognised by SPI as the
> current authoritative decision makers and SPI liaisons for OpenWRT. Successors
> will be appointed in accordance with the OpenWRT charter.

How does decision-making work? If one says yes, and one says no, what
happens? This requires clarification.

--Josh

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2009-03-16 23:32:07 Re: Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1: OpenWRT as associated project
Previous Message Jimmy Kaplowitz 2009-03-16 19:58:02 Resolution 2009-03-16.jrk.1: OpenWRT as associated project