| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Cock <p(dot)j(dot)a(dot)cock(at)googlemail(dot)com>, Martin Zobel-Helas <zobel(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
| Cc: | spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, secretary(at)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.01.bg.1: ArduPilot as associated project |
| Date: | 2016-05-10 21:41:34 |
| Message-ID: | 5732558E.8080308@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On 05/10/2016 02:38 PM, Peter Cock wrote:
> That sounds like a sensible idea in principle for all future projects.
>
> In addition to having a lawyer review the final wording, I would
> suggest there be some minimum time period as well before
> the SPI can move earmarked funds under this clause (e.g. six
> months or a year)?
Agreed but I also think we need to forgo this option on the pending
resolutions and get a global resolution written for all past and future
projects.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Atwood | 2016-05-11 03:34:48 | Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.05.bg.1: NTPsec as associated project |
| Previous Message | Peter Cock | 2016-05-10 21:38:43 | Re: SPI resolution 2016.05.01.bg.1: ArduPilot as associated project |