Re: SPI bylaws overhaul: new discussion draft

From: Josh berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, Hilmar Lapp <hlapp(at)drycafe(dot)net>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: SPI bylaws overhaul: new discussion draft
Date: 2016-11-12 16:45:13
Message-ID: 5e8457c8-1b12-a0dd-deea-6504cbcc9adb@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On 11/11/2016 09:44 AM, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> Hi Hilmar,
>
> Completely reasonable request; unfortunately I don't have an easy way to do
> that, since I didn't have Bdale's source document. I copied and pasted from the
> PDF into a fresh LibreOffice document, fixed most of the formatting issues
> manually, and proceeded from there. The lack of a diff is a big part of why I
> tried to summarize the changes in my email, and why I put item #6 in my summary
> of changes.
>
> If Bdale happened to use LibreOffice or something compatible, I could try to
> generate a diff after getting the source document from him if LibreOffice has a
> way to do that. I'm not sure about either of those "if"s and suspect the diff
> would be noisy anyway due to the reformatting.

I don't see how the membership can approve this without having the
line-item edits.

--Josh Berkus

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hilmar Lapp 2016-11-13 16:36:52 Re: SPI bylaws overhaul: new discussion draft
Previous Message Martin Michlmayr 2016-11-11 19:02:17 Re: SPI bylaws overhaul: new discussion draft