| From: | Markus Schulze <markus(dot)schulze(at)alumni(dot)tu-berlin(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Multi-winner Condorcet, vs STV |
| Date: | 2009-12-11 21:53:19 |
| Message-ID: | 7.0.1.0.1.20091211225038.05d41958@alumni.tu-berlin.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Hallo,
in my opinion, the Schulze STV method is
the best multi-winner election method:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schulze_STV
See also this list of papers:
http://m-schulze.webhop.net/schulze1.pdf
http://m-schulze.webhop.net/schulze2.pdf
http://m-schulze.webhop.net/schulze3.zip
The Schulze STV method is a method of
proportional representation by the single
transferable vote that doesn't compromise
any of the properties that are satisfied
by the Schulze single-winner election method
("cloneproof Schwartz sequential dropping").
Furthermore, the Schulze STV method minimizes
the vulnerability to free riding and vote
management strategies.
The Schulze STV method is very complicated
because I try to create a multi-winner election
method that minimizes all known strategic
problems simultaneously.
Markus Schulze
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew M.A. Cater | 2009-12-11 22:27:48 | Re: Multi-winner Condorcet, vs STV |
| Previous Message | Ian Jackson | 2009-12-11 15:07:51 | Re: Multi-winner Condorcet, vs STV |