From: | Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam(at)benfinney(dot)id(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Volunteer for assistant book-keeper (was: Make SPI book keeping more transparent?) |
Date: | 2015-06-12 02:47:13 |
Message-ID: | 851thhiqxa.fsf_-_@benfinney.id.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> On 06/11/2015 02:10 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> > Ok. I would just like to avoid, that we are suprisingly 'hit' by a
> > authority financial audit and are not prepared for that or find out
> > disagreement only then.
>
> I will note that we no longer have an assistant bookkeeper (as far as
> I know). Having a 2nd person who had oversight of all financial
> transactions was helpful; SPI should look for a new volunteer for
> this.
If this is still needed, I would like to offer myself for this.
I have some knowledge of double-entry book-keeping, though I am neither
trained in it nor much experienced. Will that disqualify me for the
role?
More generally, is there a description I can access of what the role of
assistant book-keeper for SPI would entail?
--
\ “We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the |
`\ sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his |
_o__) wife is beautiful and his children smart.” —Henry L. Mencken |
Ben Finney
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-06-18 03:52:55 | Re: Make SPI book keeping more transparent? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-06-12 00:07:31 | Re: Make SPI book keeping more transparent? |