| From: | Bdale Garbee <bdale(at)gag(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | wichert(at)wiggy(dot)net (Wichert Akkerman) |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Board of directors membership election |
| Date: | 2003-10-26 22:10:16 |
| Message-ID: | 873cdfabw7.fsf@rover.gag.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-announce spi-general |
wichert(at)wiggy(dot)net (Wichert Akkerman) writes:
> Previously Sven Luther wrote:
>> So a choice of A, B, C and D being the default option, a vote of A only,
>> could be interpreted as ADBC, and a vote of CB as CBDA.
>
> A vote of A could be ABCD, ABDC, ACDB, ACBD, ADBC or ADCD. All could
> lead to a different result.
If D is none of the above, then treating A as AD is probably the simplest
solution to avoid discarding votes cast without assuming more than the vote
cast implies?
My concern is that throwing a vote of A away is "unfriendly" even if it is
"correct" in some sense.
Bdale
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Benj. Mako Hill | 2003-10-27 05:00:00 | Re: Board of directors membership election |
| Previous Message | Craig Small | 2003-10-26 22:04:24 | Re: Board of directors membership election |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Benj. Mako Hill | 2003-10-27 05:00:00 | Re: Board of directors membership election |
| Previous Message | Craig Small | 2003-10-26 22:04:24 | Re: Board of directors membership election |