Re: Code of Conduct at events [and 1 more messages]

From: Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam(at)benfinney(dot)id(dot)au>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Code of Conduct at events [and 1 more messages]
Date: 2010-11-12 01:48:44
Message-ID: 87bp5vb9c3.fsf@benfinney.id.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:

> Adrian Bunk writes ("Re: Code of Conduct at events [and 1 more messages]"):
> > Either you can prove someone's guilt (and in the cases we are
> > talking about that implies a conviction at court) or you have to
> > treat him as non-guilty and not pass discriminating information
> > about him to others.
>
> So Harlan Ellison is entirely innocent then, despite the videos which
> show otherwise ?

No. He is not proven guilty. That is different from innocence.

--
\ “Why am I an atheist? I ask you: Why is anybody not an atheist? |
`\ Everyone starts out being an atheist.” —Andy Rooney, _Boston |
_o__) Globe_ 1982-05-30 |
Ben Finney

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Armstrong 2010-11-12 04:53:12 Re: Code of Conduct at events [and 1 more messages]
Previous Message Ben Finney 2010-11-12 01:44:55 Re: Code of Conduct at events [and 1 more messages]