| From: | Manoj Srivastava <srivasta(at)acm(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)debian(dot)org> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)spi-inc(dot)org, secretary(at)spi-inc(dot)org, board(at)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed SPI Bylaws Amendment |
| Date: | 2002-12-14 23:01:09 |
| Message-ID: | 87hedgi4sq.fsf@ember.green-gryphon.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Hi,
[ I do not have access to my gpg key, since I am travelling
away from home]
I object to this proposal; mostly since I think the proposed
fix is a broken kludge; and is quite short sighted. The correct fix
would be to get more people on the board; and to have more business
conducted by the SPI officers, without needing the board to second
guess each and every decision made by the officers.
I also found the tone of this proposal quite confrontational,
but that is not germane to my voting against it.
manoj
--
You've been leading a dog's life. Stay off the furniture.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta(at)acm(dot)org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Manoj Srivastava | 2002-12-15 00:10:50 | Re: Proposed SPI Bylaws Amendment |
| Previous Message | Michael Cardenas | 2002-12-14 20:55:47 | Re: Proposed SPI Bylaws Amendment |