Re: Summary of comments

>>>>> In article <20030217202447(dot)GA29163(at)wile(dot)excelhustler(dot)com>, John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org> writes:

> It sounds like you're suggesting that once we have our list of
> problems, we can just look at each one and either reject it as not
> applicable wrt bylaws amendments, or implement an amendment for it?

I was thinking that prioritizing the issues at hand would
also be useful, so we work on the most important issues first, and
the lower priority items come along as we come to a close.

manoj
--
Old MacDonald had an agricultural real estate tax abatement.
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta(at)acm(dot)org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C