From: | Tim Potter <tpot(at)frungy(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Martin Michlmayr <tbm(at)cyrius(dot)com> |
Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Proposed resolution - rescind position of SPI board advisors |
Date: | 2020-01-08 05:45:53 |
Message-ID: | 8E9D6FC3-A733-4448-A7F5-57C1BC8CC6BA@frungy.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
On 10 Dec 2019, at 10:19 am, Martin Michlmayr <tbm(at)cyrius(dot)com> wrote:
>
> * Bdale Garbee <bdale(at)gag(dot)com> [2019-12-09 15:59]:
>> It's not clear to me why you need to rescind the resolution instead of
>> just continuing to not actually appoint or seek advice from existing
>> appointees. What's the problem you're actually trying to solve?
>
> Make sure reality is reflected.
>
> The annual report lists the advisors, but they haven't been consulted
> in years, so imho it makes sense to reflect that. It also creates
> more balance between projects (why is the Debian project leader always
> an advisor?)
Just curious - is there was any more discussion on this topic? Perhaps
we can make a decision one way or the other at the board meeting next week.
Tim.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Michlmayr | 2020-01-12 16:09:27 | Treasurer's report for 2019-12 |
Previous Message | Philippe Cloutier | 2019-12-18 00:07:38 | SPI Advisors and Gender Imbalance (was Re: Spi-general Digest, Vol 159, Issue 2) |