From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Filipus Klutiero <chealer(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martin Michlmayr <tbm(at)cyrius(dot)com>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Issue #5 - Please explain the topic of each mailing list |
Date: | 2016-10-08 19:42:44 |
Message-ID: | 90dbe31b-35f5-1103-8e1d-dd4720fe3555@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
On 10/08/2016 09:38 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Thank you
>>
>> spi-board is a list of the board of directors to communicate. It's
>> also used as a contact address for the board.
>
> OK, but in terms of content, what discussions would be more appropriate
> to direct to spi-board than to, I guess, spi-general?
Anything that is confidential. For example, a potential legal issue.
>
>>
>> Since the general public cannot subscribe to these lists, I don't
>> think it makes sense to list them at
>> http://www.spi-inc.org/contact/mailinglists/
>> It's just confusing.
Actually I think they should be listed with their defined purpose and
their subscription requirements. It is part of the transparency and it
shows that we are conducting proper business.
>>> spi-private is the only one I am member of. Board elections is one
>>> topic sometimes treated on that list, but a private list should not
>>> be designated as the proper forum for electoral discussions.
>> Personally, I feel that spi-private has been overused and most of the
>> conversation should have been on spi-general. spi-private should only
>> be used for things that should not be public / publicly archived.
>
> I agree with you. From the approximately 100 mails sent to spi-private
> which I have read, I do not remember a single one which could not have
> been sent to spi-general (instead).
I prefer -private because generally speaking, I am talking to voting
members. The general public is great and there are times where that is
appropriate but we are not an open source project. We are a corporation
led by our members, with oversight by our board and run by our officers.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Martin Michlmayr | 2016-10-08 23:59:24 | Re: Performance Co-Pilot as associated project |
Previous Message | Filipus Klutiero | 2016-10-08 16:38:57 | Re: Issue #5 - Please explain the topic of each mailing list |