From: | David Graham <daviddbgraham(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bdale Garbee <bdale(at)gag(dot)com> |
Cc: | spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SPI By-Laws Committee -- are we alive? |
Date: | 2012-01-30 23:03:47 |
Message-ID: | CACGrwQpyEZPvFzjS_LVNMtxpysEHk0YAbKwVL-r9YEatA2HDTA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-bylaws |
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Bdale Garbee <bdale(at)gag(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 12:32:12 -0500, David Graham <daviddbgraham(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > As the last non-spam message to this list was on June 23rd, 2007, I'd
> like
> > to know who is still on here and what the appetite is to take another
> crack
> > at updating the by-laws, which have been out of date since before this
> > committee was struck nearly 10 years ago in 2002?
> >
> > Building on my experience with SPI as a Member of both an associated
> > project and the Board, I am working on a new draft of the By-Laws for
> > discussion, amendment, and ultimately, with a little luck, a referendum
> and
> > implementation. It is badly overdue.
> >
> > So, who's with me?
>
> I'm here, and I'd be happy to re-engage on this.
Glad to hear it. Any idea if we still have a valid charter for by-laws and
who, officially, is a member? Might be worthwhile reformalising it at the
Feb 9 board meeting.
Or we can operate it informally (which I'd actually prefer) and see if we
can reach a consensus to put to referendum in time for this year's AGM.
D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matt Kraai | 2012-01-31 01:35:24 | Re: SPI By-Laws Committee -- are we alive? |
Previous Message | Bdale Garbee | 2012-01-30 22:56:19 | Re: SPI By-Laws Committee -- are we alive? |