Re: Topic of spi-board (Re: Issue #5 - Please explain the topic of each mailing list)

From: Henrik Ingo <henrik(dot)ingo(at)avoinelama(dot)fi>
To: Filipus Klutiero <chealer(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Topic of spi-board (Re: Issue #5 - Please explain the topic of each mailing list)
Date: 2016-10-18 12:57:54
Message-ID: CAKHykestxpCDLw6wXxRByb3cOEy1cCiuD8fstiN4v47C=2N5ug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Filipus Klutiero <chealer(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Joshua, could you provide an example legal issue which is private (and, of
> course, which has to be)?
>

Any matter, where a failure of the opposite side to act within a
certain time will benefit or strengthen the position of the SPI member
project or SPI itself. For example, any legal situation where a
complaint needs to be raised by the opposite side within a certain
date, and the strategy of SPI / the member project would be to just
keep quiet until that date.

henrik
--
henrik(dot)ingo(at)avoinelama(dot)fi
+358-40-5697354 skype: henrik.ingo irc: hingo
www.openlife.cc

My LinkedIn profile: http://fi.linkedin.com/pub/henrik-ingo/3/232/8a7

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message rhc@open-mpi.org 2016-10-25 16:27:52 Re: Resolution The Open MPI Project as an associated project
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-10-17 18:19:47 Re: Topic of spi-board (Re: Issue #5 - Please explain the topic of each mailing list)