From: | Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Final proposed Board resolution for Board elections voting system |
Date: | 2017-03-08 18:35:42 |
Message-ID: | CANBHLUjuNqf4M1CxLp7AoW0yYU3+7uFwpC_ytw5YJeTEt=hEbA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
On 8 March 2017 at 18:09, Josh berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
>> 7. Specifically, the algorithm to be used is that specified in
>> Rules 45-52 of the Scottish Local Government Elections Order
>> 2007 (a UK Statutory Instrument):
>> http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2007/42/schedule/1/part/III/crossheading/counting-of-votes/made
>>
>> 8. The practical implementation will be by means of software; for
>> example, perhaps the openstv package in Debian. The choice of
>> software is up to the Secretary. However, any differences between
>> the Rules in the Order, and whatever software implementation is
>> chosen, are to be resolved in favour of the Rules.
>
> What the heck does that last sentence mean?
>
I came up with two versions to respond to your question:
"It means if we fail to implement the Scottish STV correctly, the
Scottish STV should be the correct result; rather than the result of
our homegrown implementation."
alternative phrasing
"If what we calculate using whatever means we choose is different to
what can be calculated using Rules 45-52 of the Scottish Local
Government Elections Order 2007 (a UK Statutory Instrument), the
latter result shall prevail."
--
Regards,
Dimitri.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Jackson | 2017-03-08 22:23:20 | Re: Final proposed Board resolution for Board elections voting system |
Previous Message | Josh berkus | 2017-03-08 18:09:02 | Re: Final proposed Board resolution for Board elections voting system |