Re: [Spi-private] Fluxbox as an SPI Asociated Project

From: "Paul R(dot) Tagliamonte" <paultag(at)fluxbox(dot)org>
To: henrik(dot)ingo(at)avoinelama(dot)fi
Cc: SPI Board <board(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, SPI Private List <spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org>, SPI General List <spi-general(at)spi-inc(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Spi-private] Fluxbox as an SPI Asociated Project
Date: 2011-10-02 13:20:44
Message-ID: CAO6P2QS-aZOT63739Cxg8N889cpLDgpdPcWSg23gDdi=ofYPhw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

[snip]

> If it is the same person as the SPI Liaison, then this should say
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ It is not :)

> "Successors will be appointed by the Fluxbox SPI Liaison."
>
> If there is a separate Fluxbox Project Leader, it would be good to
> have some reference to how the SPI Board can know who the Project
> Leader is. (For instance, if Fluxbox has an election procedure for the
> PL, then the Liaison can be tasked by informing the Board every time a
> new leader was chosen, with a link to publicly available election
> results.)

You assume we have elections :)

Fluxbox is a very tight-knight community. We've had the same leader
for the last 10 years, and if we did have a new leader, that role
would be transitioned to them without a vote.

That being said, I think that's sane. I'm sure forwarding a change in
FPL to SPI would be easy (and low volume!)

Feedback super welcome.

-Paul

--
:wq

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Henrik Ingo 2011-10-02 15:47:55 Re: [Spi-private] Fluxbox as an SPI Asociated Project
Previous Message Henrik Ingo 2011-10-02 08:09:19 Re: [Spi-private] Fluxbox as an SPI Asociated Project