From: | "Paul R(dot) Tagliamonte" <paultag(at)fluxbox(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | henrik(dot)ingo(at)avoinelama(dot)fi |
Cc: | SPI Board <board(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, SPI Private List <spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org>, SPI General List <spi-general(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [Spi-private] Fluxbox as an SPI Asociated Project |
Date: | 2011-10-02 13:20:44 |
Message-ID: | CAO6P2QS-aZOT63739Cxg8N889cpLDgpdPcWSg23gDdi=ofYPhw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
[snip]
> If it is the same person as the SPI Liaison, then this should say
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ It is not :)
> "Successors will be appointed by the Fluxbox SPI Liaison."
>
> If there is a separate Fluxbox Project Leader, it would be good to
> have some reference to how the SPI Board can know who the Project
> Leader is. (For instance, if Fluxbox has an election procedure for the
> PL, then the Liaison can be tasked by informing the Board every time a
> new leader was chosen, with a link to publicly available election
> results.)
You assume we have elections :)
Fluxbox is a very tight-knight community. We've had the same leader
for the last 10 years, and if we did have a new leader, that role
would be transitioned to them without a vote.
That being said, I think that's sane. I'm sure forwarding a change in
FPL to SPI would be easy (and low volume!)
Feedback super welcome.
-Paul
--
:wq
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Henrik Ingo | 2011-10-02 15:47:55 | Re: [Spi-private] Fluxbox as an SPI Asociated Project |
Previous Message | Henrik Ingo | 2011-10-02 08:09:19 | Re: [Spi-private] Fluxbox as an SPI Asociated Project |