From: | Chris Ingram <chris(dot)ingram(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | tim(at)oreilly(dot)com |
Cc: | crawford_d(at)acm(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Open Source trademark error in CACM |
Date: | 1999-04-07 04:02:46 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.3.96.990406223428.5613B-100000@ravine.binary.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
Mr. O'Reilly,
In your article in the April 1999 issue of _Communications of the
ACM_ titled "Lessons from Open-Source [sic] Software Development", I
believe that you state an incorrect fact. In the first sentence of the
second paragraph you state, "Officially, open source (which is a
trademark of the Open Source Initiative - see www.opensource.org)..."
Searching the US Patent and Trademark Office database (available at
http://www.uspto.gov/tmdb/) reveals that the term "Open Source" is a
certification mark of Software in the Public Interest (SPI). This is also
the assertion on their web site at http://www.spi-inc.org/trademarks/.
SPI indicates, however, that the trademark is managed by Eric Raymond,
who happens to be the founder of the Open Source Initive. OSI does not
own the trademark. Please make a note of the error and have it
corrected. Thank you.
--
Chris Ingram
Chris(dot)Ingram(at)acm(dot)org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joseph Carter | 1999-04-07 19:58:39 | Re: Open Source trademark error in CACM |
Previous Message | Christoph Lameter | 1999-04-06 04:43:18 | Re: LUGs & SPI |