| From: | Christoph Lameter <christoph(at)lameter(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Darren Benham <gecko(at)benham(dot)net> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, recipient list not shown: ; |
| Subject: | Re: Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES |
| Date: | 1999-03-31 00:32:13 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.03.9903301631030.986-100000@cyrix200.lameter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Darren Benham wrote:
> > How about a petition scheme. If a petition is pgp signed by 10% of the
> > membership then a vote will be taken which can override any decision of
> > leadership?
> I'd prefer a seconds approach, personally. Maybe 10% of the body "seconds"
> it... but 10% of the people have to sign? 100+ signatures on one document?
> Maybe I'm misunderstanding you...
yes. 100+ signatures on one document in order to get a vote by all
members on an issue. Basically to reverse a decision of the leadership in
sticky situations. maybe we can make it less than 10%?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wichert Akkerman | 1999-03-31 00:33:11 | Re: Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES |
| Previous Message | Darren Benham | 1999-03-31 00:20:32 | Re: Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES |