From: | Christoph Lameter <christoph(at)lameter(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan(at)debian(dot)org> |
Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, recipient list not shown: ; |
Subject: | Re: Resolution 1999-08-03.nl: Guidelines for Equipment and Service Donations |
Date: | 1999-08-16 17:48:04 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.10.9908161045480.9843-100000@opensource.captech.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
We (who is we?) develop drivers? I think there is an expectation but we
cannot guarantee that we will fulfill that expectation.
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> By no means - consider the hardware donations aimed at creating support
> for the hardware. They give it to us on the condition that we use it
> to develop drivers for it. It may be a foreign agenda, but it may also
> be our own internal agenda.
>
> On Thu, Aug 05, 1999 at 05:50:17PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > I would expect them at least to pretent that this is an altruistic act and
> > agree to a no strings donation. We cannot allow a foreign agenda to
> > control the organization.
> >
> > On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Ean R . Schuessler wrote:
> >
> > > I disagree. I don't think that it would be unusual or, for that matter, unfair
> > > for a donor to place some constraints on their donation. We must remember that
> > > many times these donations will not be of a purely altruistic nature. I can
> > > envision many situations where a donor may be giving something to us because
> > > they hope that we can do something for them. I think that this may be
> > > especially true in the case of large donations.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Paul Crowley | 1999-08-16 19:16:45 | Re: Resolution 1999-08-03.nl: Guidelines for Equipment and Service Donations |
Previous Message | Ean R . Schuessler | 1999-08-16 17:00:01 | Re: Resolution 1999-08-03.nl: Guidelines for Equipment and Service Donations |