Re: Resolution 2003-10-14.iwj.1c

I would be fine with the removal of clauses 16-19. I understand Manoj is
working on a revised clause 20.

---
David "cdlu" Graham
Guelph, Ontario
cdlu(at)railfan(dot)ca

On Tue, 14 Oct 2003, Martin Schulze wrote:

> I'm not convinced that these sections should be part of either resolution.
> They don't contribute any useful input except slamming on the board for
> $whatever and the bylaws committee.
>
> David Graham wrote:
> > > FURTHERMORE, WHEREAS
> > >
> > > 16. The ad-hoc organisation of this election is less transparent and
> > > democratic than ideal;
> > >
> > > 17. The bylaws reform effort appears to have stalled;
> > >
> > > 18. These problems are in significant part attributable to the
> > > Board;
> > >
> > > IT IS RESOLVED THAT
> > >
> > > 19. The Board apologises to the Membership and the Bylaws committee
> > > for its failure to work more proactively to help reform the
> > > bylaws.
> > >
> > 20. The Board shall undertake the work necessary to modify the
> > Oranisation's by-laws as per the recommendations of the By-Laws
> > Committee as soon as the election is complete.
>
> --
> Long noun chains don't automatically imply security. -- Bruce Schneier
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spi-general mailing list
> Spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
> http://lists.spi-inc.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/spi-general
>