From: | David Graham - SPI Secretary <cdlu(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Adam Fedor <fedor(at)doc(dot)com>, board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: GNUstep project support problem |
Date: | 2004-11-08 15:37:43 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.55.0411081032330.30371@baffin |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
Adam -- the board meeting is tomorrow at 19:00 UTC in #spi on
irc.spi-inc.org (irc.oftc.net) if you'd like to come.
> I see. It's good that the FSF have decided to do this. There's no
> harm, and some merit, in having more than one legal organisation do
> it.
I'm with Ian on this in that I see no problem in GNUstep being part of
both FSF and SPI. The two organisations are not working against eachother
and there should be no trouble caused by such a relationship.
Ian, do you have a final copy of the resolution for voting on by any
chance?
> There is some risk of upsetting the FSF, I suppose. How much of a
> hurry are you in ? If you are willing to wait another month it might
> be worthwhile taking that time for us to talk to the FSF, at least so
> that we can smooth over any ruffled features.
I don't see any particular need to delay this on account of FSF.
---
David Graham, SPI Secretary
cdlu(at)spi-inc(dot)org D5F45889
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Goerzen | 2004-11-08 15:49:52 | Re: GNUstep project support problem |
Previous Message | Ian Jackson | 2004-11-08 15:21:21 | Re: GNUstep project support problem |