From: | Robert Brockway <robert(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | SPI Board <board(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SPI Meeting Reminder: Thursday 14th June, 2012 @ 20:00 UTC |
Date: | 2012-06-15 00:41:18 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.00.1206151024590.9652@castor.opentrend.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-announce spi-general |
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm afraid I've had a bit to drink now, but:
Uh oh, I think we're off to a bad start :)
> This is absolutely ridiculous. Do yuo have no reading comprehension
> whatsoever ? What on earth do _you_ think "authortitative
> decisionmaker" means ? Do you have access to a dictionary ?
Actually my reading comprehension is very good, but thanks for asking. I
explained my understanding of the term and the reasons behind it back on
May 25. No need to repeat them again.
>> I disagree on this point. My position is that we should definitely have
>> counsel review any proposed resolution template before we put it in to
>> action. This need not be an onerous process. SFLC has been very quick to
>> respond to our queries in the past. I am very impressed by the service
>> they have been providing us.
>
> This is absolutely ridiculous. This "resolution template" was put
Yes, so you've said twice already :)
> into action without legal review and now you are treating it as some
> kind of immutable gospel and refusing to budge from it!
Actually I have stated on numerous occassions my willingness to change the
wording. I just do not wish to change it in the manner you have
suggested.
In a worst case scenario the wording of a resolution could be interpretted
by a court of competent jurisdiction. Even if the original wording was
not reviewed by a lawyer I don't want to compound the problem by changing
the resolution without proper consideration at this time. There is
increased interested among FOSS projects to use fiscal sponsorship and
this is a good time to review the wording of the resolution template[1].
[1] I hadn't mentioned it earlier but moves towards this were already
afoot before you raised the concern.
> Apparently you have convinced a majority of the board.
> This is absolutely ridiculous. Don't they have any reading
> comprehension either ???
My experiences with the board would lead me to conclude that they have
excellent reading comprehension, some of them in several languages.
:)
Speaking only for myself as an individual director, as always.
Rob
--
Director, Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
Email: robert(at)spi-inc(dot)org Linux counter ID #16440
IRC: Solver (OFTC & Freenode)
Web: http://www.spi-inc.org
Free and Open Source: The revolution that quietly changed the world
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-06-27 22:04:55 | Re: SPI Meeting Reminder: Thursday 14th June, 2012 @ 20:00 UTC |
Previous Message | Ian Jackson | 2012-06-15 00:00:13 | Re: SPI Meeting Reminder: Thursday 14th June, 2012 @ 20:00 UTC |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-06-19 18:12:36 | Open Bioinformatics Foundation as Associated Project |
Previous Message | Ian Jackson | 2012-06-15 00:00:13 | Re: SPI Meeting Reminder: Thursday 14th June, 2012 @ 20:00 UTC |