| Lists: | spi-general |
|---|
| From: | John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Update from Tuesday? |
| Date: | 2002-12-19 19:03:09 |
| Message-ID: | 20021219190309.GG19828@wile.excelhustler.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Hi,
Can someone on the board update us about the e-mail voting being conducted
about the things discussed Tuesday -- how soon it should be complete (or if
it already is) and the outcome?
Thanks,
John
| From: | Wichert Akkerman <wichert(at)wiggy(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Update from Tuesday? |
| Date: | 2002-12-19 19:34:19 |
| Message-ID: | 20021219193419.GF5178@wiggy.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Previously John Goerzen wrote:
> Can someone on the board update us about the e-mail voting being conducted
> about the things discussed Tuesday -- how soon it should be complete (or if
> it already is) and the outcome?
The resolution regulating e-mail voting is very clear: it will take
seven days. Since I circulated a draft resolution on tuesday and
submitted the final resolution for voting yesterday the result will
be next tuesday.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <wichert(at)wiggy(dot)net> http://www.wiggy.net/
A random hacker
| From: | Wichert Akkerman <wichert(at)wiggy(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Update from Tuesday? |
| Date: | 2002-12-25 23:25:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20021225232557.GL32472@wiggy.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Previously John Goerzen wrote:
> Can someone on the board update us about the e-mail voting being conducted
> about the things discussed Tuesday -- how soon it should be complete (or if
> it already is) and the outcome?
The appointment of Ean as VP has been accepted and posted to
spi-announce. Joey vetoed the creation of the by-laws committee;
I have put that on the agenda for the next meeting (see
http://www.spi-inc.org/~wichert/agenda/) so we can have a
standard vote on the resolution (which does not allow for a veto).
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <wichert(at)wiggy(dot)net> http://www.wiggy.net/
A random hacker