OSS/Nader FUD article

Lists: spi-general
From: Mitch Blevins <mblevin(at)mindspring(dot)com>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: OSS/Nader FUD article
Date: 1999-04-11 17:47:36
Message-ID: E10WOKW-0000ey-00@turd.mountaintop
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general

In foo.spi-general, you wrote:
>
> http://www.capitalresearch.org/trends/ot-0499a.html
>
> An interesting and detailed piece of FUD. Also mentions several other
> organizations who support OSS as a benefit to consumers. Actually, it
> mostly concentrates on Nader, and is clearly a hard right-wing
> publication.

I've already written them asking them to correct the part in this article
that lists Debian as a "Company that sells manuals and support for Linux".

-Mitch


From: Havoc Pennington <rhp(at)zirx(dot)pair(dot)com>
To: Lynn Winebarger <owinebar(at)se232(dot)math(dot)indiana(dot)edu>
Cc: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: OSS/Nader FUD article
Date: 1999-04-11 21:28:28
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.02A.9904111722590.17459-100000@zirx.pair.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general


The funny thing is the way he goes on about Nader's "ideology" and then he
totally ignores all reality/evidence and "proves" that OSS can't possibly
work using nothing but theory. "But the earth must be flat, because
otherwise my theories would be wrong!" :-P

Havoc


From: Lynn Winebarger <owinebar(at)se232(dot)math(dot)indiana(dot)edu>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: OSS/Nader FUD article
Date: 1999-04-11 21:30:51
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.3.96.990411162756.29372A-100000@rapscallion.math.indiana.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: spi-general


http://www.capitalresearch.org/trends/ot-0499a.html

An interesting and detailed piece of FUD. Also mentions several other
organizations who support OSS as a benefit to consumers. Actually, it
mostly concentrates on Nader, and is clearly a hard right-wing
publication.

Lynn