| Lists: | spi-general |
|---|
| From: | Robert Brockway <robert(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | SPI General List <spi-general(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Associated Project Howto updated |
| Date: | 2012-06-03 12:22:10 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.00.1206031927330.20288@castor.opentrend.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Hi all. I have updated the associated project howto to better reflect
current practice. When a project is considering applicating there is
a period of informal discussion that goes on. I've spelled
this out more explicitely on the page:
http://www.spi-inc.org/projects/associated-project-howto/
This is really a continuation of the changes to the howto I began many
months ago. I wanted to wait until I'd been on the board for longer and
understood SPI processes better before continuing with the clean up.
Cheers,
Rob
--
Director, Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
Email: robert(at)spi-inc(dot)org Linux counter ID #16440
IRC: Solver (OFTC & Freenode)
Web: http://www.spi-inc.org
Free and Open Source: The revolution that quietly changed the world
| From: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Brockway <robert(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
| Cc: | SPI General List <spi-general(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Associated Project Howto updated |
| Date: | 2012-06-06 12:57:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20431.21453.943348.171395@chiark.greenend.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Robert Brockway writes ("Associated Project Howto updated"):
> Hi all. I have updated the associated project howto to better reflect
> current practice. When a project is considering applicating there is
> a period of informal discussion that goes on. I've spelled
> this out more explicitely on the page:
>
> http://www.spi-inc.org/projects/associated-project-howto/
>
> This is really a continuation of the changes to the howto I began many
> months ago. I wanted to wait until I'd been on the board for longer and
> understood SPI processes better before continuing with the clean up.
Can you please get rid of the `authoritative decisionmaker' wording,
which I have been complaining about ? It shouldn't be in the
template.
Thanks,
Ian.
| From: | Robert Brockway <robert(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | SPI General List <spi-general(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Associated Project Howto updated |
| Date: | 2012-06-14 21:09:02 |
| Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.00.1206150612520.9652@castor.opentrend.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Can you please get rid of the `authoritative decisionmaker' wording,
> which I have been complaining about ? It shouldn't be in the
> template.
Hi Ian. Sorry I didn't responded earlier. As per my earlier email I will
be referring this to SFLC. I regret that I haven't done so yet to due to
other committments but expect to do so over the weekend.
Cheers,
Rob
--
Director, Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
Email: robert(at)spi-inc(dot)org Linux counter ID #16440
IRC: Solver (OFTC & Freenode)
Web: http://www.spi-inc.org
Free and Open Source: The revolution that quietly changed the world