From: | "Darren O(dot) Benham" <gecko(at)benham(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [DRAFT 2] Bylwas Revision: COMMITTEES |
Date: | 1999-04-15 20:57:21 |
Message-ID: | 19990415135721.C11397@darren.benham.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
On Wed, Apr 14, 1999 at 05:46:47PM -0500, Lynn Winebarger wrote:
> Just curious about how difficult it will be to add more permanent
> committees. I'm thinking that as the organization grows, some tasks
> left to the BOD will become too onerous for them to handle, but will be
> important enough to need a dedicated committee (budget work may fall in
> this category if the ball really get rolling in donations/supported
> projects). I think the two are fine to start with, as long as more can be
> added as they become needed.
"Permanent committees" can be added by just activating a charter and never
deactivating it. The idea behind putting commmittees in the By-Laws is to
make it very difficult to ever disband the commitee. Because it's not
listed here doesn't mean it has to expire...
--
Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
=========================================================================
* http://benham.net/index.html <gecko(at)benham(dot)net> <>< *
* -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------*
* Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster *
* <gecko(at)debian(dot)org> <secretary(at)debian(dot)org> <lintian-maint(at)debian(dot)org> *
* <webmaster(at)debian(dot)org> <gecko(at)fortunet(dot)com> <webmaster(at)spi-inc(dot)org> *
=========================================================================
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nils Lohner | 1999-04-15 22:18:36 | [DRAFT 1] Definition of Motions and Resolutions |
Previous Message | Nils Lohner | 1999-04-15 20:43:32 | Bylaws Revision: VOTING |