From: | Branden Robinson / SPI Treasurer <branden+spi-treasurer(at)deadbeast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Ties in Elections |
Date: | 2003-02-07 16:01:00 |
Message-ID: | 20030207160100.GL17341@deadbeast.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:23:42AM -0500, Dale E Martin wrote:
> I think of it in terms of "I like these three people, and I prefer 'none of
> the above' to the other two". As long as that's what not filling out the
> entire ballot means I think we're OK. A corner case of this would be
> turning in a blank ballot (or one where 'none of the above' was the only
> choice.)
>
> I don't want to start another huge discussion about voting mechanisms, but
> I wanted to point out why "none of the above" could be a valid choice in
> such an election.
Oh, certainly. I agree that such an option permits an added degree of
expressiveness, which is a valuable thing. My point was simply that I'm
not sure if this is a characteristic of the Condorcet Method per se.
And any twiddle to the Condorcet method *might* vitiate some of its
desirable properties (one has to do some formal analysis to find out).
I probably need to go refresh my memory at electionmethods.org.
--
G. Branden Robinson, Treasurer
Software in the Public Interest, Inc.
treasurer(at)spi-inc(dot)org
http://www.spi-inc.org/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Manoj Srivastava | 2003-02-07 16:21:06 | Re: Ties in Elections |
Previous Message | Dale E Martin | 2003-02-07 12:23:42 | Re: Ties in Elections |