Re: Ties in Elections

From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta(at)acm(dot)org>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Ties in Elections
Date: 2003-02-07 16:21:06
Message-ID: 87isvw83kd.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

>>"Branden" == Branden Robinson / SPI Treasurer <branden+spi-treasurer(at)deadbeast(dot)net> writes:

> Oh, certainly. I agree that such an option permits an added degree of
> expressiveness, which is a valuable thing. My point was simply that I'm
> not sure if this is a characteristic of the Condorcet Method per
> se.

Eh? Why wouldn't the "None of the above" option be yet another
option as far as condorcet is concerned?

> And any twiddle to the Condorcet method *might* vitiate some of its
> desirable properties (one has to do some formal analysis to find out).

I see. I suggest you check out debian-vote over the last few
months, where this has been debated at length; Debian's current
voting methods draft states that a default option ("further
discussion" , nominally) exists unless otherwise stated -- and that
means most votes shall indeed have a default option.

manoj
--
If some day we are defeated, well, war has its fortunes, good and
bad. Commander Kor, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta(at)acm(dot)org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matt Kraai 2003-02-07 20:53:00 Linux Standards Base relationship
Previous Message Branden Robinson / SPI Treasurer 2003-02-07 16:01:00 Re: Ties in Elections