From: | Manoj Srivastava <srivasta(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Ties in Elections |
Date: | 2003-02-07 16:21:06 |
Message-ID: | 87isvw83kd.fsf@glaurung.green-gryphon.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
>>"Branden" == Branden Robinson / SPI Treasurer <branden+spi-treasurer(at)deadbeast(dot)net> writes:
> Oh, certainly. I agree that such an option permits an added degree of
> expressiveness, which is a valuable thing. My point was simply that I'm
> not sure if this is a characteristic of the Condorcet Method per
> se.
Eh? Why wouldn't the "None of the above" option be yet another
option as far as condorcet is concerned?
> And any twiddle to the Condorcet method *might* vitiate some of its
> desirable properties (one has to do some formal analysis to find out).
I see. I suggest you check out debian-vote over the last few
months, where this has been debated at length; Debian's current
voting methods draft states that a default option ("further
discussion" , nominally) exists unless otherwise stated -- and that
means most votes shall indeed have a default option.
manoj
--
If some day we are defeated, well, war has its fortunes, good and
bad. Commander Kor, "Errand of Mercy", stardate 3201.7
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta(at)acm(dot)org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matt Kraai | 2003-02-07 20:53:00 | Linux Standards Base relationship |
Previous Message | Branden Robinson / SPI Treasurer | 2003-02-07 16:01:00 | Re: Ties in Elections |