From: | John Goerzen <jgoerzen(at)complete(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | spi-bylaws(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: #04: Electronic Meetings |
Date: | 2003-05-31 14:07:39 |
Message-ID: | 20030531140739.GA30745@complete.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-bylaws |
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:59:29AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> Our next item of old business is #04, electronic meetings.
I'm not sure what I think about this one yet. Here are some of my thoughts:
1. I think that actually holding e-mail meetings is, at best, a stretch of
the bylaws. I know there is disagreement on that point, but I think we can
all agree that if we want to permit that, we should make it clear.
2. I continue to believe that a lot of the quorum and e-mail problems are a
result of the board failing to delegate to committees as anticipated in the
original bylaws. Yet, in a very real sense, we are still in an initial
"ramp up" phase (yes, even after these years) with getting accounting
procedures in place, etc. I could see a "sunset clause" (e-mail meetings
are authorized for one year, for instance) being of use.
3. If for some reason we can't address #2, I'd be in favor of a workable
conservative e-mail voting mechanism. However, my preference is to treat
the problem rather than its symptoms.
Thoughts?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Graham | 2003-05-31 14:15:13 | Re: #04: Electronic Meetings |
Previous Message | John Goerzen | 2003-05-31 13:59:29 | #04: Electronic Meetings |