Re: Resolution 2003-10-14.iwj.1c

I'm not convinced that these sections should be part of either resolution.
They don't contribute any useful input except slamming on the board for
$whatever and the bylaws committee.

David Graham wrote:
> > FURTHERMORE, WHEREAS
> >
> > 16. The ad-hoc organisation of this election is less transparent and
> > democratic than ideal;
> >
> > 17. The bylaws reform effort appears to have stalled;
> >
> > 18. These problems are in significant part attributable to the
> > Board;
> >
> > IT IS RESOLVED THAT
> >
> > 19. The Board apologises to the Membership and the Bylaws committee
> > for its failure to work more proactively to help reform the
> > bylaws.
> >
> 20. The Board shall undertake the work necessary to modify the
> Oranisation's by-laws as per the recommendations of the By-Laws
> Committee as soon as the election is complete.

--
Long noun chains don't automatically imply security. -- Bruce Schneier