On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:26:49AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> > There is heaps of spam on spi-general@, and almost no real messages.
> > I suspect the latter is an effect of the former.
>
> FYI: I have very aggressive anti-spam filtering. These are the first two
> messages I've received from spi-general in the last month or more.
>
> Personally, I don't see why we need to help any non-subscribed addresses
> getting through to this list. Can anyone point me to the archives on why we
> do this?
Because subscribers sometimes use non-subscribed addresses, because
some discussion include some third-party, etc.
Cheers,
Bill.