From: | Bill Allombert <allomber(at)math(dot)u-bordeaux(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [Spi-private] Re: Please moderate the SPI mailing lists |
Date: | 2006-06-06 20:51:35 |
Message-ID: | 20060606205135.GW12479@seventeen |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 05:58:22PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 08:26:49AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > > There is heaps of spam on spi-general@, and almost no real messages.
> > > I suspect the latter is an effect of the former.
> >
> > FYI: I have very aggressive anti-spam filtering. These are the first two
> > messages I've received from spi-general in the last month or more.
> >
> > Personally, I don't see why we need to help any non-subscribed addresses
> > getting through to this list. Can anyone point me to the archives on why we
> > do this?
>
> Because subscribers sometimes use non-subscribed addresses, because
> some discussion include some third-party, etc.
Speaking of that, I received:
Your mail to 'Spi-general' with the subject
Re: [Spi-private] Re: Please moderate the SPI mailing lists
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Post by non-member to a members-only list
so it seems Spi-general is actually moderated now ?
Cheers,
Bill.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-06-06 23:24:32 | Re: [Spi-private] Re: Please moderate the SPI mailing lists |
Previous Message | Bill Allombert | 2006-06-06 15:58:22 | Re: [Spi-private] Re: Please moderate the SPI mailing lists |