| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
| Cc: | board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-board(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, Jimmy Kaplowitz <treasurer(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, secretary(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Spi-private] private vs. general: Openness of Board Discussions |
| Date: | 2007-02-15 17:44:45 |
| Message-ID: | 200702150944.46206.josh@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Jimmy,
> (Josh, please remove -private on any replies to any of my mails in this
> thread, unless you still think it's important for -private to be
> included in addition to -general.)
It is right now.
> As I said, it seems to be fixed for more than 6 months now, so we have
> no need to shy away from -general for a silly reason like a spam problem
> when it's the right list to use.
What I'm contending is that right now, today, we have dozens of contributing
members who are receiving mail from -private but not from -general. If all
contributing members need to pay attention to -general, we need to notify
them to resubscribe on -private *first*.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Project
Core Team Member
(any opinions expressed are my own)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Petter Reinholdtsen | 2007-02-15 17:57:03 | Re: [Spi-private] private vs. general: Openness of Board Discussions |
| Previous Message | Jimmy Kaplowitz | 2007-02-15 17:39:10 | Re: [Spi-private] Re: Resolution 2007-02-15.jrk.1: Openness of Board Discussions |