Re: [Spi-private] Re: Resolution 2007-02-15.jrk.1: Openness of Board Discussions

From: Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: board(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-board(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, Jimmy Kaplowitz <treasurer(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, secretary(at)spi-inc(dot)org, spi-private(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Spi-private] Re: Resolution 2007-02-15.jrk.1: Openness of Board Discussions
Date: 2007-02-15 17:39:10
Message-ID: 20070215173910.GH28237@mail.kaplowitz.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

(Josh, please remove -private on any replies to any of my mails in this
thread, unless you still think it's important for -private to be
included in addition to -general.)

On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 09:30:48AM -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> I'm not worried if *I'm* subscribed and receiving mail. I am. I'm worried
> about the contributing members who said months ago that they had unsubscribed
> because of the spam problem.

As I said, it seems to be fixed for more than 6 months now, so we have
no need to shy away from -general for a silly reason like a spam problem
when it's the right list to use.

- Jimmy Kaplowitz
jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2007-02-15 17:44:45 Re: [Spi-private] private vs. general: Openness of Board Discussions
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2007-02-15 17:30:48 Re: Resolution 2007-02-15.jrk.1: Openness of Board Discussions