Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Cc: Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status
Date: 2007-03-16 18:48:05
Message-ID: 200703161148.05220.josh@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

All,

Given that we say in point (1) that the authority of the DPL & Secretary
derive from the Debian constitution, I really don't see why (5) is necessary
at all. The only "dispute of authority" I'm willing to accept will be one
grounded in the constitution, and if there is such a dispute we can take it
as assumed that some DD or Board member will bring it up.

No matter how we re-write (5), it's superfluous and an invitation to DD's to
argue with the DPL on the SPI-lists. Again, I would like it to be simply
removed.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Project
Core Team Member
(any opinions expressed are my own)

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-03-16 18:54:10 Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-03-16 18:37:28 Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status