Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status

Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jimmy Kaplowitz writes ("Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status"):
>> 5. The Board relies on Debian Developers and others to ensure that the
>> Board is made aware of Debian decisions relevant to SPI that are not
>> communicated to the Board in a timely manner by the Debian Project
>> Leader or the Debian Project Secretary; of disagreement among Debian
>> developers regarding the identity of the Debian Project Leader or the
>> Debian Project Secretary; and of disagreement among Debian developers as
>> to the authority held by either of those two Debian officials, but only
>> insofar as this authority is relevant to SPI. The Board requests that
>> those who notify it of decisions or disagreements in accordance with
>> this paragraph take reasonable efforts to look for prior notifications
>> to the Board on the same topic, and that the Board not be notified again
>> if the new notification would be substantially the same as a previous
>> one.
>>
>> This avoids the inaction loophole you were mentioning, and adds the
>> relevance and novelty criteria. Does this work for you
>
> Yes, thanks.
>
>> (and everyone else who's still reading)?
>
> *snort* I think we've bored them away by now ...
>

No but I don't want to start up another issue ;)

Joshua D. Drake

> Ian.
> _______________________________________________
> Spi-general mailing list
> Spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
> http://lists.spi-inc.org/listinfo/spi-general

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/