Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections

From: Anthony Towns <aj(at)azure(dot)humbug(dot)org(dot)au>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections
Date: 2007-07-26 12:12:09
Message-ID: 20070726121209.GA979@azure.humbug.org.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-announce spi-general

On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:00:22AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Steve Greenland <steveg(at)moregruel(dot)net> wrote:
> > Why on earth are you not using the Debian implementation?
> At a guess, because the Debian implementation doesn't do multi-winner
> elections.

The SPI election method has the same problems with multi-winner elections
as using the Debian implementation would, fwiw. I think the SPI method was
used by Debian prior to the adoption of the current Cloneproof Schwartz
method and devotee.

Cheers,
aj

Responses

Browse spi-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MJ Ray 2007-07-27 08:05:24 Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections
Previous Message Sven Luther 2007-07-26 08:09:52 Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message MJ Ray 2007-07-27 08:05:24 Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections
Previous Message Sven Luther 2007-07-26 08:09:52 Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections