From: | Sven Luther <sven(at)powerlinux(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop> |
Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections |
Date: | 2007-07-26 08:09:52 |
Message-ID: | 20070726080952.GA3497@powerlinux.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-announce spi-general |
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 09:00:22AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Steve Greenland <steveg(at)moregruel(dot)net> wrote:
> > Why on earth are you not using the Debian implementation?
>
> At a guess, because the Debian implementation doesn't do multi-winner
> elections. There was a recent discussion about the best way to extend
> it to multi-winners in the "soc-ctte discussion" thread centred around
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/06/msg00254.html
>
> If you'd like to discuss how to extend the Debian implementation to
> produce multi-winners, I suggest doing that on debian-project. The
> soc-ctte seems likely to be an earlier test than next spi-board and if
> it works, it could be proposed for spi-board.
That supposed the soc-ctte proposal gets implemented, which means a
vote, and the project currently is in limbo as far as i can tell.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anthony Towns | 2007-07-26 12:12:09 | Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections |
Previous Message | MJ Ray | 2007-07-26 08:00:22 | Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Anthony Towns | 2007-07-26 12:12:09 | Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections |
Previous Message | MJ Ray | 2007-07-26 08:00:22 | Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections |