Re: Election results

From: Neil McGovern <neilm(at)spi-inc(dot)org>
To: spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Election results
Date: 2007-08-07 13:29:48
Message-ID: 20070807132948.GB31390@mx0.halon.org.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-announce spi-general

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 11:58:27AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> However, it's interesting that I think both first-past-the-post and
> alternative vote (also known as instant run-off voting, reportedly
> recommended by Robert's Rules for election-by-mail) would have
> resulted in this same board:
>

I've done a few others (Borda, Borda Elimination, Minmax, Nanson, Ranked
Pairs, Condorcet (SPI), Condorcet (Debian), Bucklin, IRV, Pluralty) at
http://blog.halon.org.uk/geek/spi/2007-election-results-calcs.html
for those interested

> > 95 votes were received.
>
> Finally, as I understand it, turn-out was 25% of voting members (not
> the 25% of SPI members that some press reported). Why was turn-out so
> low (at least, I think it's low for a vote-by-mail in this type of
> organisation) and what steps will SPI be taking to increase it?
>

A review of who is a contributing member will be underway shortly.

Neil
--
Neil McGovern
Secretary, Software in the Public Interest, Inc.

Responses

Browse spi-announce by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho 2007-08-07 13:49:09 Re: Election results
Previous Message Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho 2007-08-07 11:08:44 Re: Election results

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho 2007-08-07 13:49:09 Re: Election results
Previous Message Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho 2007-08-07 11:08:44 Re: Election results