From: | Bill Allombert <Bill(dot)Allombert(at)math(dot)u-bordeaux(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |
Date: | 2016-11-17 19:54:21 |
Message-ID: | 20161117195421.GB3657@yellowpig |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:32:15AM -0800, Josh berkus wrote:
> On 11/17/2016 11:27 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > On 11/17/2016 10:59 AM, Josh berkus wrote:
> >
> >> That's not relevant to why we need an admin. Nor has anyone suggested
> >> hiring a fundraiser.
> >>
> >> SPI is at this point a $500K organization. It is downright
> >> irresponsible of us not to have paid staff to handle the paperwork.
> >> Sooner or later, we will miss some important piece of paperwork and get
> >> disaccredited.
> >
> > Correct, which is why I am an advocate of paid officers. I am not
> > opposed to office staff either of course, but if we pay staff, at a
> > minimum we must pay who manages that staff.
>
> Do we have officers who could spend more time on SPI if they were paid
> to do so?
A NPO cannot pay officers and ex-officers without creating a major
conflict of interest.
Cheers,
Bill.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-11-17 20:04:20 | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |
Previous Message | Hilmar Lapp | 2016-11-17 19:33:30 | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |