From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |
Date: | 2016-11-17 20:04:20 |
Message-ID: | 4c3037e8-76cc-a97a-c915-12b2f2a27e87@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
On 11/17/2016 11:32 AM, Josh berkus wrote:
> On 11/17/2016 11:27 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> On 11/17/2016 10:59 AM, Josh berkus wrote:
>> Correct, which is why I am an advocate of paid officers. I am not
>> opposed to office staff either of course, but if we pay staff, at a
>> minimum we must pay who manages that staff.
>
> Do we have officers who could spend more time on SPI if they were paid
> to do so?
I don't know that it matters. Officers of a corporation should be
compensated. It is also normal for established non profits to do so (See
Python Foundation).
Of course we could get into a discussion as to the motivational quality
of a dollar but I don't know if that would produce a productive result.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-11-17 20:05:53 | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |
Previous Message | Bill Allombert | 2016-11-17 19:54:21 | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |