Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>, spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org
Subject: Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence
Date: 2016-11-17 20:04:20
Message-ID: 4c3037e8-76cc-a97a-c915-12b2f2a27e87@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: spi-general

On 11/17/2016 11:32 AM, Josh berkus wrote:
> On 11/17/2016 11:27 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> On 11/17/2016 10:59 AM, Josh berkus wrote:

>> Correct, which is why I am an advocate of paid officers. I am not
>> opposed to office staff either of course, but if we pay staff, at a
>> minimum we must pay who manages that staff.
>
> Do we have officers who could spend more time on SPI if they were paid
> to do so?

I don't know that it matters. Officers of a corporation should be
compensated. It is also normal for established non profits to do so (See
Python Foundation).

Of course we could get into a discussion as to the motivational quality
of a dollar but I don't know if that would produce a productive result.

Sincerely,

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.

Responses

Browse spi-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2016-11-17 20:05:53 Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence
Previous Message Bill Allombert 2016-11-17 19:54:21 Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence