| From: | Martin Michlmayr <tbm(at)cyrius(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bdale Garbee <bdale(at)gag(dot)com> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org, Tim Potter <tpot(at)frungy(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposed resolution - rescind position of SPI board advisors |
| Date: | 2019-12-09 23:19:03 |
| Message-ID: | 20191209231903.GB29219@jirafa.cyrius.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
* Bdale Garbee <bdale(at)gag(dot)com> [2019-12-09 15:59]:
> It's not clear to me why you need to rescind the resolution instead of
> just continuing to not actually appoint or seek advice from existing
> appointees. What's the problem you're actually trying to solve?
Make sure reality is reflected.
The annual report lists the advisors, but they haven't been consulted
in years, so imho it makes sense to reflect that. It also creates
more balance between projects (why is the Debian project leader always
an advisor?)
(For the record, I'm not on the board and can't speak for SPI. But I
brought this up when I was on the board and had the action item to
write a resolution, which unfortunately I never did.)
--
Martin Michlmayr
https://www.cyrius.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Filipus Klutiero | 2019-12-10 01:12:04 | Re: Proposed resolution - rescind position of SPI board advisors |
| Previous Message | Bdale Garbee | 2019-12-09 22:59:07 | Re: Proposed resolution - rescind position of SPI board advisors |