From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |
Date: | 2016-11-17 22:02:49 |
Message-ID: | 9da0c297-3984-3094-1711-5083c3a8319b@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-general |
On 11/17/2016 01:46 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 01:32:21PM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> On 11/17/2016 01:09 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
>>
>>>> Do we have officers who could spend more time on SPI if they were paid
>>>> to do so?
>>>
>>> A NPO cannot pay officers and ex-officers without creating a major
>>> conflict of interest.
>>
>> An NPO can absolutely pay officers. They can't pay board members.
>
> However, all current SPI officers are board members.
Yes.
I have had lengthy discussions with legal for both SPI and for PgUS on
this matter. It is completely acceptable to pay an officer of an NPO. It
is not possible to pay a board member. It is completely acceptable to
compensate an Officer who happens to be a board member for their duties
as an Officer. It is also normal to do so.
Sincerely,
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Everyone appreciates your honesty, until you are honest with them.
Unless otherwise stated, opinions are my own.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh berkus | 2016-11-17 23:25:11 | Re: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |
Previous Message | Bill Allombert | 2016-11-17 21:46:13 | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |