| From: | Josh berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org>, Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |
| Date: | 2016-11-17 23:25:11 |
| Message-ID: | eb613384-8e30-bf9a-f60d-c0a447807fc2@postgresql.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
On 11/16/2016 10:27 PM, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> As with Martin Michlmayr's reply, I'm fine with the bylaws specifying that we
> should have a board attendance policy, and that falling below a certain
> threshold can (or should or must) lead to removal for cause. I'd rather leave
> the specifics of that policy and that threshold to a board resolution to allow
> for lower-hassle tweaking as needed, but I don't feel strongly on that point.
Yeah, what I'm mainly looking for is "there will be a policy, and it
will be enforced," rather than setting the *actual* policy in the bylaws.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Holger Levsen | 2016-11-18 13:36:46 | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-11-17 22:02:49 | Re: Staff Work WAS: SPI bylaws overhaul: Board Attendence |