| From: | Ian Jackson <ijackson(at)chiark(dot)greenend(dot)org(dot)uk> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jimmy Kaplowitz <jimmy(at)spi-inc(dot)org> |
| Cc: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status |
| Date: | 2007-03-16 18:32:52 |
| Message-ID: | 17914.58068.731161.924287@chiark.greenend.org.uk |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | spi-general |
Jimmy Kaplowitz writes ("Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status"):
> 5. The Board relies on Debian Developers and others to ensure that the
> Board is made aware of Debian decisions relevant to SPI that are not
> communicated to the Board in a timely manner by the Debian Project
> Leader or the Debian Project Secretary; of disagreement among Debian
> developers regarding the identity of the Debian Project Leader or the
> Debian Project Secretary; and of disagreement among Debian developers as
> to the authority held by either of those two Debian officials, but only
> insofar as this authority is relevant to SPI. The Board requests that
> those who notify it of decisions or disagreements in accordance with
> this paragraph take reasonable efforts to look for prior notifications
> to the Board on the same topic, and that the Board not be notified again
> if the new notification would be substantially the same as a previous
> one.
>
> This avoids the inaction loophole you were mentioning, and adds the
> relevance and novelty criteria. Does this work for you
Yes, thanks.
> (and everyone else who's still reading)?
*snort* I think we've bored them away by now ...
Ian.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-03-16 18:37:28 | Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status |
| Previous Message | Jimmy Kaplowitz | 2007-03-16 18:24:48 | Re: Draft resolution formalising Debian's Associated Project status |