From: | MJ Ray <mjr(at)phonecoop(dot)coop> |
---|---|
To: | spi-general(at)lists(dot)spi-inc(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections |
Date: | 2007-07-26 08:00:22 |
Message-ID: | 46a85496.1CXFM3a1K8PeibpL%mjr@phonecoop.coop |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox |
Thread: | |
Lists: | spi-announce spi-general |
Steve Greenland <steveg(at)moregruel(dot)net> wrote:
> Why on earth are you not using the Debian implementation?
At a guess, because the Debian implementation doesn't do multi-winner
elections. There was a recent discussion about the best way to extend
it to multi-winners in the "soc-ctte discussion" thread centred around
http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2007/06/msg00254.html
If you'd like to discuss how to extend the Debian implementation to
produce multi-winners, I suggest doing that on debian-project. The
soc-ctte seems likely to be an earlier test than next spi-board and if
it works, it could be proposed for spi-board.
Hope that helps,
--
MJ Ray - see/vidu http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Experienced webmaster-developers for hire http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
Also: statistician, sysadmin, online shop builder, workers co-op.
Writing on koha, debian, sat TV, Kewstoke http://mjr.towers.org.uk/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sven Luther | 2007-07-26 08:09:52 | Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections |
Previous Message | Steve Greenland | 2007-07-25 22:46:20 | Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sven Luther | 2007-07-26 08:09:52 | Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections |
Previous Message | Steve Greenland | 2007-07-25 22:46:20 | Re: Final Call for Votes and extra Voting Information - 2007 SPI board elections |